Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:10
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Geert Wilders: Dutch government collapses as far-right leader exits coalition - BBC
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Chase Sapphire Reserve’s Annual Fee Is Increasing to $795. Is It Still Worth It? - AFAR
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Why is evolution such a controversial topic?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Staying in This Place Too Long Could Change How You Age, Scientists Say - The Daily Galaxy
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Treasury yields slide as ADP payrolls fall to lowest in more than two years - CNBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Does the Hamas charter specifically call for the death of all Jews and the destruction of Israel?